Chekhov's Mistress
A Bookstore Grows in Brooklyn
Friends have often told me “You should have a bookstore, Bud.” But the truth is if I had a bookstore of my own I’d go out of business within a month. Example: Customer walks in and asks for a copy of Nanny Diaries to which I reply, looking over my reading glasses, “I’m sorry, we don’t carry that title. May I interest you in, perhaps… War & Peace? You know, we have two new translations and I’m happy to discuss which you might find more appealing [strains of Bach’s B minor Mass in the background].”
“Uh, no thanks.”
“I’m going to have to ask you to leave.”
But there are people who are serious about bookselling, to the point of putting together a well-thought business plan for their potential store. And, just as important, there are people out there with money willing to fund such a plan based on its merits, even to the point of overcoming their pre-conceived notion of how disastrous it might be to open a bookstore in the age of Amazon and high rents. Congratulations, Jessica! She won the Brooklyn Business Library PowerUp! Business Plan Competition to the tune of $15,000 for her business plan to open a bookstore in Brooklyn. Read about it at her blog, The Written Nerd.
comments
A friend of mine had planned to open a bookstore in Astoria, last year. Though, after a few weeks of planning and re-thinking, she dropped the idea. The reasons were pretty similar the ones you wrote. I think in a post-amazon, post-B&N;world one way for a bookstore to thrive is to offer what they can’t. For example a bookstore geared towards the neighborhood it’s in or towards local writers or a bookstore with a changing theme based on the current events or such.
– Parth (01/28 at 01:42 PM)
Our local BookCourt does that - the books are varied, but you’ll find stuff that is right for the neighborhood (books from indie presses is one example) and they are involved with local writers, doing readings and such. They are expanding, so I guess it’s working.
– Bud Parr (01/28 at 02:16 PM)
Anyone coming into this business has to absolutely love it and have a distinct point of view. It doesn’t take much of a search on the internet to see that there are many wonderful virtual independent storefronts trying to make a name and a “profit” for themselves just as there are some wonderful neighborhood bookstores.
Favorite customer question over the years: “there was this book on the today show and I can’t remember the title or the author but it was blue”
– Mary (01/30 at 08:10 PM)
So, which translation would you suggest? I’m forever partial to Constance Garnett’s. I wasn’t wildly impressed with the Pevear/Volokhonsky translation of Anna Karenina (since it differed little from Garnett’s); and when I looked at their recent translation of War & Peace, I again didn’t see the need to upgrade from Connie.
(My love of the Garnett W&P; hinges primarily on the Daniel Cooper scene very early in the novel. I didn’t want to give the impression that my preference was at all scholarly. I just think the Garnett reads better.)
(By the way, I found you through Edward Champion’s blog.)
– Mike B. (02/07 at 10:54 AM)
Well, I was being tongue-in-cheek, Mike because I’ve only read the Maud translation, which is the standard. I am intrigued by the new Pevear & Volkhonsky translation. I’ve read some of their Dostoevsky translations and I’ve seen them speak about their translation philosophy. And then there’s the Bromfield translation that just came out too, which is apparantly from the “original version” of the book - that one is slightly shorter (my copy is a proof, but it’s 912 pages) versus over 1200 pages for the P&V;translation (My Maud translation was one of those Norton editions and I think they pack them in so the pagination is not the same). Thanks!
– bud Parr (02/07 at 09:15 PM)
Page 1 of 1 pages of comments
Creative Commons License Deed Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported
You are free:
- to Share — to copy, distribute and transmit the work
-
Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
-
No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
- For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. The best way to do this is with a link to this web page.
- Any of the above conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder.
- Nothing in this license impairs or restricts the author's moral rights.
This is a human-readable summary of the Legal Code (the full license):
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode
This site employs rank-denial and other anti-spam measures.
Your link here will do nothing for your rankings or traffic. Off-topic comments will be deleted.
Previous entry: "It's kaleidoscopic"
About this Post
- Posted by: Bud Parr
- Date: January 28, 2008
- Filed Under:
Dependent Children of Independent Bookstores
- Comments:5
- Links to this Post: Technorati
