I almost didn’t pick up Maggie Nelson’s book Jane {a murder}. The title and the photo on the cover said to me “this is not a book for you.” Looking at the back cover, phrases like “dark, female masterpiece,” “true story of a murder” and “blurred-genre memoir” all confirmed that this was a book to put on the bottom of the burgeoning stack. Somewhere inside of me though, I like to think there exists a sixth sense, a nagging intuition about good books that made me pick up Jane just to read a page or two. I didn’t put it down again.
Jane {a murder} is a classified as a book of poetry and a book of true crime. It is all things described, but none of those capture its singular purpose and its classification doesn’t matter when you read it. It’s a story well told of a woman brutally killed and another woman yearning to know more about the ever present shade of her murdered aunt. Jane was murdered in 1969 while a student at the University of Michigan. Four years later, Jane’s sister had a daughter who knew about her aunt, but never quite enough and certainly never about the night she was shot, which was just one in a series of media-sensationalized killings dubbed the “Michigan Murders.”
As an antidote to that sensationalism, Nelson explores Jane’s life and death with a poet’s sensibility through anecdotes, clippings and diary entries. Her skill as a poet is matched by the way she weaves these various elements together as a deft storyteller. In fact, the diary entries, which were written years before her murder are not all in chronological order, but seamlessly placed in the order, perhaps, of Maggie Nelson’s emotional discovery.
These two passages sit on facing pages. The first is Jane’s diary entry from 1966, around the age of twenty, three years before her death:
Careless dribble – again
Strange, lying in bed
unable to sleep
That’s all familiar
but the thoughts inside of me
are not
Questions, over and over
home too long, back too soon
alone, really alone
What are you like when you’re alone
ugly, heavy, disreputable
unsure, awake, useless
This room is hideous
The next page, titled “Hideous”, comes after Ms. Nelson has maybe come to know too much about Jane’s murder:
Unable to sleep, surrounded by
her words. Afraid, truly afraid
to tell you about my brain
chattering with cruelties-
When did she know
she was in danger;
the terrible little gun
flat against her head;
which shot first,
the front or the back?
The fear,
her fear
but I cannot imagine that.
Why keep trying?
I can hear you say. Well
I can’t help it. I just do. Then
to stop the thoughts, I imagine
two quick, dull shots
that come as a sort of relief. Don’t you know,
I recognize this
as hell.
I try to use the tricks I’ve learned to get through this-
Meditate on a wrathful deity.
Watch it melt into light.
And so I do, and find
that not even Kali
with her mouth full of blood
non Thor with his hammer
can take me away from here, where
your breath spouts out of you
and I listen.
Ms. Nelson took some license with Jane’s diary entries, at the least creating line-breaks, but she uses them to such great affect that they become Jane’s cries. What under normal circumstances are fairly typical reflections on youthful angst and self-doubt – “right now I hate my sister so…I am jealous of Barb’s fun, dates, looks, assurance…” – become here the private truths of a woman denied her life before she had a chance to work them out – “This kid doesn’t know anything. / She’d like to sleep the childish slumber of a baby and yet live in a world of complexities.” – through them we come closer to understanding her tragedy, not so much through pathos but empathy.
What makes the difference between pathos and empathy is restraint. That is a strength in this book. Halfway through we are led to the murder scene, the press and investigation, meditations on blood – “Can anyone like blood the way one likes the mountain or the sea” – the freaks that call Jane’s grieving parents – “Where’s Jane, boo-hoo-hoo” – and other detritus left in the wake of a brutal murder, like the psychic brought in to solve the case of the serial killer – “Her face was beat, beat, beat. It was wrinkled like a monkey’s.” But before she takes us too far down the path of “true-crime,” just when we start to feel like voyeurs getting too close, Nelson puts down the looking-glass and stops to breath – “Somehow I need to make it clear: none of these details belongs to me.” By then though, like stumbling across a dead body, we can’t forget what we’ve seen – “the imaginary is what tends / to become real, and when it does / there’s no paint black enough / to cover it up.”
In the beginning of the book, Nelson imagines the final moments of Jane’s life:
She had been shot once in the front and once in the back of the head. She wandered, trying to find someone to remove the slugs from her skull. She was not dead yet, but she feared she was dying.The holes in her head were perfectly round and bloodless, with burnt-flared edges, two eclipses. The passage of air through the holes felt peculiar, just dimly painful, like chewing hot or cold food on a cavity, the sensation of space where it had once been dense and full.
Sunlight shot around the circumference of each black rind, so that a long shaft of pale light cast out from the center of her forehead, and another shaft streamed behind her.
Is this the light of the mind? Is this the light of my mind?
This would be an easy passage to overdo, but I think it’s great. It tells us right in the beginning that the author has put herself as nearly as she can imagine into the shoes of Jane. And although Jane’s parents don’t figure prominently in the book, this piece, where she says “the sensation of space where it had once been dense and full” signifies their loss, the void where there was once a life.
Jane works so well because the poetry itself is nearly invisible. So much contemporary poetry tends to be too self-conscious to let its meaning work on you, but Maggie Nelson’s poems manage to both fluidly pull us through the story and stand alone – they are purposeful and poignant with no pretense. Indeed, I would classify Jane {a murder} as a page-turner.
Maggie Nelson…
Interview at Small Spiral Notebook
Interview at Here Comes Everybody
Detail Page at Soft Skull Press
Attribution. You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).
No Derivative Works. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work.
This is a human-readable summary of the Legal Code (the full license):
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/legalcode
This site employs rank-denial and other anti-spam measures.
Your link here will do nothing for your rankings or traffic. Off-topic comments will be deleted.